Time for change?
Moderators: Nick Sopowski, ClubAdmin
Re: Time for change?
Thanks Rupert that's good to know.. and just as well as I'm not sure I could cope with that sort of play off
- Greenfinch
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 10:20 am
Re: Time for change?
Some of the comments on here are just hypothetical trash, who cares about statistics,its past we move on,Mark has bought in new players, and I'm sure others are in the pipeline,just let him get on with the job.It's December, we are not fighting relegation, we are in a relegation place, and two wins we are in the mix of other clubs in a similar situation. Relegation battles are usually around April/May so to all you pessimists, so called 'Managers,' expert advisers, blind loyalists, (which comment is an insult to our fans) to ones that can't come due to the stress of relegation, and others that will surely be offended by my comments,you're not helping the situation.
This is the time when real fans support Mark and the team, and most of the 400+ fans do that.
This is the time when real fans support Mark and the team, and most of the 400+ fans do that.
Re: Time for change?
I see Stratford have just appointed Tim Flowers as their new manager, not so long ago he came to top field as Manager of Solihull Moors in that FA Cup
tie, how things change !
tie, how things change !
Re: Time for change?
Where has Jackie said she will not go due to being stressful?? What she has said is, she will not attend to see us relegated ,
after 19 games we are bottom I fail to see how that does not put us in relegation battle, your comment on 2 wins will put us in the mix is also hypothetical , you are basing this on those teams around us not winning their games.
In truth most of your comments are actually hypothetical trash , if you are insulted at being called a blind loyalist then should we be equally insulted by being called pessimists, so called managers and expert advisors ??,because we have a different view to you, we are not helping the situation? Why ? Do you think the manager gives a monkey's what we think!
I would like nothing more than to be wrong as would many others ,currently I do not see this happening
after 19 games we are bottom I fail to see how that does not put us in relegation battle, your comment on 2 wins will put us in the mix is also hypothetical , you are basing this on those teams around us not winning their games.
In truth most of your comments are actually hypothetical trash , if you are insulted at being called a blind loyalist then should we be equally insulted by being called pessimists, so called managers and expert advisors ??,because we have a different view to you, we are not helping the situation? Why ? Do you think the manager gives a monkey's what we think!
I would like nothing more than to be wrong as would many others ,currently I do not see this happening
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:49 am
Re: Time for change?
Hi Rupe! I've actually interpreted this slightly differently.RST wrote: ↑Sun Nov 28, 2021 11:35 amThere will be seven clubs reprieved from relegation at our Step 3 (four divisons) Russell. It'll be decided on Points Per Game, so staying bottom definitely won't help our cause!
By my reckoning there are currently only 5 teams at Step 3 with a worse PPG than us, so we still have work to do to survive by that escape route!
Click on the image below to see the whole Tweet:
I was under the impression that the bottom two in each step three division will go down regardless of their PPG.
Then of the teams in 20th position in the Southern League South, Northern League Premier and the Isthmian Premier, plus the side placed 19th in our division (one less team in our division), the club with the worst PPG would join the 8 already relegated.
(I've re-read this sentence about five times and am still not sure I've structured this sentence in a legible way).
I could have got that all wrong though.
On the subject of relegation - think it's fair to all agree that additional, experienced reinforcements are probably required to bolster the squad, because the results aren't coming and we aren't currently missing any critical players to injury.
Re: Time for change?
The Chair at Stratford is Jed McCrory who was at Solihull. And I guess they have some FA Cup money left over to splash around?
A serial club owner at Banbury, Swindon, the Worcester Raiders rugby vanity project, rumoured to have tried to get in at Yeovil, and - if you go back to 2014 - involved with Tommy Agombar as Hereford United went down the pan. He's already made his mark at Stratford by changing their nickname!
Is that the sort of person we'd like in charge of the club?
Maybe that is as much of a question as who we want in the dugout. (Although as Neil noted a while ago, Mark is as wrapped up in the web of companies surrounding HTFC and the Arena as Andy Melvin is.)
Re: Time for change?
You could well be right Stew - and it would make sense.CanaryHatter wrote: ↑Sun Nov 28, 2021 3:34 pm Hi Rupe! I've actually interpreted this slightly differently.
I was under the impression that the bottom two in each step three division will go down regardless of their PPG.
Then of the teams in 20th position in the Southern League South, Northern League Premier and the Isthmian Premier, plus the side placed 19th in our division (one less team in our division), the club with the worst PPG would join the 8 already relegated.
(I've re-read this sentence about five times and am still not sure I've structured this sentence in a legible way).
I could have got that all wrong though.
Either way, best to finish no worse than 18th just to make sure.
Re: Time for change?
Jackie you write a load of rubbish.
Re: Time for change?
You might not agree with Jackie, Spooks, but have the courage to show your face rather than via a cowardly pseudonym. Easy to sling stones behind a fence, eh?
Re: Time for change?
Jackie actually makes some interesting points, whether you agree with them or not.